|
|
@@ -235,13 +235,10 @@ Once this is done every variable should be able to dump regions into
|
|
|
their inferior-process buffer using major-mode functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
*** TODO some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten [2/3]
|
|
|
-While I remember, some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten
|
|
|
-come to mind in that regard:
|
|
|
+ While I remember, some possible requests/proposed changes for Carsten
|
|
|
+ come to mind in that regard:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**** DEFERRED a hook called when the src edit buffer is created
|
|
|
-This should be implemented in the org-mode core
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-**** DEFERRED Remap C-x C-s to save the source to the org buffer?
|
|
|
+**** DONE Remap C-x C-s to save the source to the org buffer?
|
|
|
I've done this personally and I find it essential. I'm using
|
|
|
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
|
|
|
(defun org-edit-src-save ()
|
|
|
@@ -272,7 +269,21 @@ org-mode core
|
|
|
Maybe we should name the buffer with a combination of the source
|
|
|
code and the session. I think that makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Are you also suggesting a new org-edit-src minor mode?
|
|
|
+ [ES] Are you also suggesting a new org-edit-src minor mode?
|
|
|
+ [DED] org-exit-edit-mode is a minor mode that already exists:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Minor mode installing a single key binding, "C-c '" to exit special edit.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ org-edit-src-save now has a binding in that mode, so I guess all
|
|
|
+ I'm saying at this stage is that it's a bit of a misnomer. But
|
|
|
+ perhaps we will also have more functionality to add to that minor
|
|
|
+ mode, making it even more of a misnomer. Perhaps something like
|
|
|
+ org-src-mode would be better.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+**** DEFERRED a hook called when the src edit buffer is created
|
|
|
+This should be implemented in the org-mode core
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
|
*** DEFERRED send code to inferior process
|
|
|
Another thought on this topic: I think we will want users to send
|
|
|
@@ -306,6 +317,9 @@ being edited. I think that we should either do this before the buffer
|
|
|
is opened or not at all, specifically I think we should resolve
|
|
|
references if the user calls C-c ' with a prefix argument. Does that
|
|
|
sound reasonable? [Eric]
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Yes [Dan]
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
** TODO fully purge org-babel-R of direct comint interaction
|
|
|
try to remove all code under the [[file:lisp/org-babel-R.el::functions%20for%20evaluation%20of%20R%20code][;; functions for evaluation of R code]] line
|
|
|
|
Dan Davison