|
|
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ table, allowing the test suite to be run be evaluation of the table
|
|
|
and the results to be collected in the same table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-* Tasks [22/38]
|
|
|
+* Tasks [22/39]
|
|
|
** TODO Create objects in top level (global) environment [0/6]
|
|
|
*sessions*
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -630,19 +630,24 @@ $0
|
|
|
|
|
|
waiting for guidance from those more familiar with yasnippets
|
|
|
|
|
|
-** TODO resolve references to other buffers
|
|
|
+** TODO resolve references to other org buffers/files
|
|
|
This would allow source blocks to call upon tables, source-blocks,
|
|
|
- and results in other buffers.
|
|
|
+ and results in other org buffers/files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
See...
|
|
|
- [[file:lisp/org-babel-ref.el::TODO%20allow%20searching%20for%20names%20in%20other%20buffers][org-babel-ref.el:searching-in-other-buffers]]
|
|
|
- [[file:lisp/org-babel.el::defun%20org-babel%20find%20named%20result%20name][org-babel.el#org-babel-find-named-result]]
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
+** TODO resolve references to other non-org files
|
|
|
+ - tabular data in .csv, .tsv etc format
|
|
|
+ - files of interpreted code: anything stopping us giving such files
|
|
|
+ similar status to a source code block?
|
|
|
+ - Would be nice to allow org and non-org files to be remote
|
|
|
** TODO figure out how to handle errors during evaluation
|
|
|
R has a try function, with error handling, along the lines of
|
|
|
python. I bet ruby does too. Maybe more of an issue for functional
|
|
|
style; in my proposed scripting style the error just gets dumped to
|
|
|
the org buffer and the user is thus alerted.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
** TODO figure out how to handle graphic output
|
|
|
This is listed under [[* graphical output][graphical output]] in out objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -653,6 +658,68 @@ results in the buffer. Then if there is a combination of =silent= and
|
|
|
=file= =:results= headers we could drop the results to a temp buffer
|
|
|
and pop open that buffer...
|
|
|
|
|
|
+** TODO Finalise behaviour regarding vector/scalar output
|
|
|
+*** DONE Stop spaces causing vector output
|
|
|
+This simple example of multilingual chaining produces vector output if
|
|
|
+there are spaces in the message and scalar otherwise.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[Not any more]
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+#+begin_src R :var msg=msg-from-python
|
|
|
+paste(msg, "und R", sep=" ")
|
|
|
+#+end_src
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+#+resname:
|
|
|
+: org-babel speaks elisp y python und R
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+#+srcname: msg-from-python
|
|
|
+#+begin_src python :var msg=msg-from-elisp
|
|
|
+msg + " y python"
|
|
|
+#+end_src
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+#+srcname: msg-from-elisp
|
|
|
+#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var msg="org-babel speaks"
|
|
|
+(concat msg " elisp")
|
|
|
+#+end_src
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+** TODO re-implement helper functions from org-R
|
|
|
+*** Initial statement [Eric]
|
|
|
+ Much of the power of org-R seems to be in it's helper functions for
|
|
|
+ the quick graphing of tables. Should we try to re-implement these
|
|
|
+ functions on top of org-babel?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ I'm thinking this may be useful both to add features to org-babel-R and
|
|
|
+ also to potentially suggest extensions of the framework. For example
|
|
|
+ one that comes to mind is the ability to treat a source-code block
|
|
|
+ like a function which accepts arguments and returns results. Actually
|
|
|
+ this can be it's own TODO (see [[* source blocks as functions][source blocks as functions]]).
|
|
|
+*** Objectives
|
|
|
+ - We want to provide convenient off-the-shelf actions
|
|
|
+ (e.g. plotting data) that make use of our new code evaluation
|
|
|
+ environment but do not require any actual coding.
|
|
|
+*** Design proposal
|
|
|
+ - *Input data* will be specified using the same mechanism as :var
|
|
|
+ references, thus the input data may come from a table, or
|
|
|
+ another source block, and it is initially available as an elisp
|
|
|
+ data structure.
|
|
|
+ - We introduce a new #+ line, e.g. #+BABELDO. C-c C-c on that
|
|
|
+ line will apply an *action* to the referenced data.
|
|
|
+ - *Actions correspond to source blocks*: our library of available
|
|
|
+ actions will be a library of org-babel source blocks. Thus the
|
|
|
+ code for executing an action, and the code for dealing with the
|
|
|
+ output of the action will be the same code as for executing
|
|
|
+ source blocks in general
|
|
|
+ - Optionally, the user can have the relevant source block inserted
|
|
|
+ into the org buffer after the (say) #+BABELDO line. This will
|
|
|
+ allow the user to fine tune the action by modifying the code
|
|
|
+ (especially useful for plots).
|
|
|
+ - So maybe a #+BABELDO line will have header args
|
|
|
+ - :data (a reference to a table or source code block)
|
|
|
+ - :action (or should that be :srcname?) which will be something
|
|
|
+ like :action pie-chart, referring to a source block which will
|
|
|
+ be executed with the :data referent passed in using a :var arg.
|
|
|
+ - :showcode or something controlling whether to show the code
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
** TODO share org-babel
|
|
|
how should we share org-babel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -823,24 +890,6 @@ tabel
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another example is in the [[*operations%20in%20on%20tables][grades example]].
|
|
|
|
|
|
-** PROPOSED Are we happy with current behaviour regarding vector/scalar output?
|
|
|
-This simple example of multilingual chaining produces vector output if
|
|
|
-there are spaces in the message and scalar otherwise.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-#+begin_src R :var msg=msg-from-python
|
|
|
-paste(msg, "und_R", sep="_")
|
|
|
-#+end_src
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-#+srcname: msg-from-python
|
|
|
-#+begin_src python :var msg=msg-from-elisp
|
|
|
-msg + "_y_python"
|
|
|
-#+end_src
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-#+srcname: msg-from-elisp
|
|
|
-#+begin_src emacs-lisp :var msg="org-babel_speaks"
|
|
|
-(concat msg "_elisp")
|
|
|
-#+end_src
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
** PROPOSED conversion between org-babel and noweb (e.g. .Rnw) format
|
|
|
I haven't thought about this properly. Just noting it down. What
|
|
|
Sweave uses is called "R noweb" (.Rnw).
|
|
|
@@ -884,17 +933,6 @@ This would allow for display of images upon export providing
|
|
|
functionality similar to =org-exp-blocks= only in a more general
|
|
|
manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-** PROPOSED re-implement helper functions from org-R
|
|
|
-Much of the power of org-R seems to be in it's helper functions for
|
|
|
-the quick graphing of tables. Should we try to re-implement these
|
|
|
-functions on top of org-babel?
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-I'm thinking this may be useful both to add features to org-babel-R and
|
|
|
-also to potentially suggest extensions of the framework. For example
|
|
|
-one that comes to mind is the ability to treat a source-code block
|
|
|
-like a function which accepts arguments and returns results. Actually
|
|
|
-this can be it's own TODO (see [[* source blocks as functions][source blocks as functions]]).
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
** DEFERRED use textConnection to pass tsv to R?
|
|
|
When passing args from the org buffer to R, the following route is
|
|
|
used: arg in buffer -> elisp -> tsv on file -> data frame in R. I
|