| 
					
				 | 
			
			
				@@ -203,6 +203,23 @@ would then be [[#sandbox][the sandbox]]. 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				 ** PROPOSED optional timestamp for output 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				    Add option to place an (inactive) timestamp at the #+resname, to 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				    record when that output was generated. 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+ 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+*** source code block timestamps (optional addition) 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    If we did this would we then want to place a timestamp on the 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    source-code block, so that we would know if the results are 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    current or out of date?  This would have the effect of caching the 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    results of calculations and then only re-running if the 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    source-code has changed.  For the caching to work we would need to 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    check not only the timestamp on a source-code block, but also the 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    timestamps of any tables or source-code blocks referenced by the 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+    original source-code block. 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+ 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+**** maintaining source-code block timestamps 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+     It may make sense to add a hook to `org-edit-special' which could 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+     update the source-code blocks timestamp.  If the user edits the 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+     contents of a source-code block directly I can think of no 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+     efficient way of maintaining the timestamp. 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				+ 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				 ** PROPOSED use example block for large amounts of stdout output? 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				    We're currently `examplizing' with : at the beginning of the line, 
			 | 
		
	
		
			
				 | 
				 | 
			
			
				    but should larger amounts of output be in a 
			 |